A process-led view
The review covers production processes, shift patterns, chemical reactions and machine operating conditions as well as the building itself.
Fire risk assessment for industrial facilities.
We analyse the facility’s processes, operating conditions and existing fire-safety infrastructure on site, then report risk priorities in detail.
Field and engineering
We see the risks in the field and turn priorities into a practical plan.
Fire risk assessment is one of the most critical engineering and occupational-safety activities for protecting people, preventing material losses and maintaining business continuity. An effective assessment goes beyond desk-based checks: it examines the facility’s processes, operating conditions and existing fire-safety infrastructure on site, then reports risk priorities using concrete evidence.
01
How is a fire risk assessment carried out?
The assessment follows a systematic, staged methodology:
Preliminary review and document collection
We review architectural drawings, emergency plans, electrical installation compliance reports, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) and existing fire-system schematics.
Site inspection and field data collection
Our specialists inspect production lines, storage areas, electrical panels and emergency escape routes on site.
Hazard and ignition-source identification
Combustible materials (gas, liquid and solid) are matched with possible ignition sources such as hot surfaces, electrical sparks, static electricity and friction.
Assessment of the existing fire-safety infrastructure
We test and assess the technical adequacy of fire detection and alarm systems, automatic suppression systems (sprinkler, gaseous and foam), smoke vents and fire doors.
Risk scoring and prioritisation
Identified risks are rated and reported using the Fine-Kinney, 5×5 matrix or NFPA methods, considering likelihood and potential impact.
Action plan
Short-, medium- and long-term improvement actions are defined to address the identified gaps.
02
What should a fire risk assessment consider?
The validity of the assessment depends on the critical parameters reviewed in the field:
Regulatory and international standards
The assessment is based on the applicable Turkish fire-protection regulation and supported by standards such as NFPA, EN and FM Global.
System integrity
We check whether suppression, detection, ventilation and building-automation systems work together in an integrated and synchronised way.
Secondary risks
Toxic gas release, ATEX explosion risk and environmental or operational effects such as extinguishing water entering drainage systems are also considered.
People and training
The review considers emergency awareness, response-team competence and the regularity of evacuation drills alongside the availability of equipment.
03
Risks and tailored solutions by facility type
Fire load, ignition dynamics and protection needs vary significantly between industries.
Production facilities (automotive, plastics, textile, metal)
- Risks
- Machine friction, high-temperature furnaces, dust explosions and large raw-material or semi-finished stocks.
- Recommended solutions
- Local CO₂ or aerosol systems for high-risk machines and production lines; spark detection and suppression for dust collectors and filters; early smoke and heat exhaust vents at roof level.
Logistics and high-bay storage centres
- Risks
- Rapid vertical fire spread, smoke accumulating beneath the roof and difficult intervention in narrow aisles.
- Recommended solutions
- In-rack sprinklers and high-flow ESFR heads; VESDA active air-sampling detection in areas with strong airflow; fire compartmentation with fire-rated walls.
Chemical, paint and hazardous-area facilities
- Risks
- Flammable and explosive liquid or vapour, static discharge and reactive chemicals.
- Recommended solutions
- Ex-proof electrical equipment, luminaires and sensors in Zone 1 and Zone 2; fuel-compatible NFF foam systems with documented environmental properties for suitable polar or non-polar solvent risks; ESD valves and optical flame detectors for gas leaks.
Data centres and service buildings
- Risks
- Sensitive electronics, high electrical loads, concealed cable fires and equipment damage from water.
- Recommended solutions
- Non-conductive FK-5-1-12, FM-200 or inert-gas systems that leave no water or residue; independent detection below raised floors and above suspended ceilings; cabinet-specific micro-gas systems inside electrical panels.
04
Fire-safety comparison by facility type
| Facility type | Main fire risk | Priority detection | Recommended suppression |
|---|---|---|---|
| Production facility | Heat, friction and dust explosion | Heat and spark detectors | Local CO₂ / water sprinkler |
| Logistics warehouses | Vertical fire spread and high fire load | VESDA active air sampling | ESFR and in-rack sprinklers |
| Chemical / petrochemical | Flammable liquid or gas explosion | Ex-proof flame and gas detectors | Automatic foam suppression |
| Data centres | Electrical arc and electronic equipment loss | High-sensitivity smoke detectors | Clean-agent suppression (FK-5-1-12) |
An effective fire risk assessment is a living process that follows the facility’s changing operation. Every process change, new machine or area expansion should trigger an update to the risk-assessment report so emergency management and facility safety remain aligned.